I would like to comment here that, while I completely and totally disagree with his evaluation of those who are attached to the Church's ancient liturgical practices, his knowledge of the liturgical history of the Catholic Church during the 20th century is quite impressive and it actually reveals that he does have a real grasp of the subject.
He doesn't suffer from the notion that everything was done one way prior to V2 and then it was the Council that suddenly out of nowhere changed everything. His knowledge of what Pius XII did to the Mass far surpasses that of your average internet trad with their endless string of ad hominem slanders. I mean really, before the indult that Francis himself issued to permit the use of the pre-Pian Easter Vigil I wonder how many how many trads out there even knew there were twelve prophecies in that form?
This awesome.
I would like to comment here that, while I completely and totally disagree with his evaluation of those who are attached to the Church's ancient liturgical practices, his knowledge of the liturgical history of the Catholic Church during the 20th century is quite impressive and it actually reveals that he does have a real grasp of the subject.
He doesn't suffer from the notion that everything was done one way prior to V2 and then it was the Council that suddenly out of nowhere changed everything. His knowledge of what Pius XII did to the Mass far surpasses that of your average internet trad with their endless string of ad hominem slanders. I mean really, before the indult that Francis himself issued to permit the use of the pre-Pian Easter Vigil I wonder how many how many trads out there even knew there were twelve prophecies in that form?
This is the problem with Bergoglio and his cabal - a better speech is imaginary.
Tim, I'm stealing this for a homily. Stephens